VSL is much better on computer resources that EW- but I haven't tried their new PLAY plugin yet. Where EW already has chorus/tunning/EQ applied to it. Most film guys lean more towards VSL b/c it sounds more realistic to natural life-like strings. But you can make it do many different styles, and when you figure out your sound, VSL sounds amazing. ![]() With VSL you have to adjust the EQ for each, and adjust tunning reverbs can become complex, and other crazy stuff. You do not need Kontakt the current EW version comes with a small sample plugin which is VERY cpu hungry, btw. He used EW Gold and recorded the Mormon Tabernacle Choir for that game score, he told us in March at the GDC.) That score sounds amazing.Įast West are just about to announce their stand-alone host called Play, which looks good. (The guy who scored Tomb Raider- can't recall his name. Most think that East West Platinum is overkill. I prefer the VSL Opus Bundle, which has now been replaced by a Vienna Instruments version, I think. Hi, I'm a film and game composer and have used both. It's by far the most versatile string library I have. I use it ALL the time, in many, many different musical settings. But VSL gets my vote as the undisputed top dog. I suppose it comes down to what your needs are. You can use samples of EW in Kontakt, if you happen to own Kontakt, but you don't need Kontakt to use EW. By the way, you don't need Kontakt to use EW, it comes with it's own Kontakt "player". It's far, far superior than the Kontakt player that (currently) comes with EW. And the Vienna plug-in is really an amazing piece of software. And the recording quality of VSL is unparalleled as well. The legato patches in ANY of the VSL libraries make it a no brainer, IMO. The answer is yes (your own arranging and programming skills not withstanding). The issue should be, can I program realistic string arrangements with these libraries. It's so stupid easy to add a decent convolution reverb to VSL using Space Designer, that shouldn't be an issue to you at all. If you are at all interested in small, chamber settings, or quartet settings, EW isn't even a choice. You can turn down the release samples, but IMO, there goes 50% of the believability factor. This is especially noticeable in the release samples. ![]() I also own East West Platinum Orchestra.įor the work I do, I use VSL 98% of the time, and when I do use the EW strings, they're layered with VSL.Įast West's "close" samples, still have a sufficient amount of hall reverb in them. I own VSL's Chamber Strings, Solo Strings, Appasionata Strings (In the Vienna Instrument), and Opus 1 (in EXS format). (FYI - not interested in Garritan, Hunter, or any of the other string samplers - I've done all that homework for weeks and narrowed it down to only these two). Hoping to hear from someone with experience in both VSL and East West. If not, I'll put up with the hassles of constructing good sound using VSL - can't stand the idea of living with each string not stepping all over the next one with its reverb. Is there a way to cut the reverb easily on East West Platinum by using one of the three mic positions or some other way to create a chamber orchestra or string quartet environment without going technoid on the samples? But I also don't want to drown in sloppy wet samples. I don't want to have to spend hours adding reverb and doctoring VSL samples to make them come to life - I'm not that technical. ![]() ![]() I also understand that VSL works directly with Logic Pro but East West needs Kontakt (eventually it will have it's own driver, but that is many months off for Platinum, likely a year). I'm hearing East West is very "wet" but that VSL requires considerable manual work to add reverb, etc. I'm trying to decide if I should go with East West Platinum or VSL as my virtual symphonic instruments.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |